Abstract. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The following text constitutes a critical analysis of 6.41, from Tractatus Logico-
Philosophicus. As I have understood it, the paragraph contains an argument (central to
Wittgenstein’s book) meant to support the conclusion at 6.421: “It is clear that ethics
cannot be expressed. (\u2026)”. In what follows I aim to do three things. First, I will talk about
the context of 6.41. Then I will try to reconstruct the argument of 6.41 such that its logical
structure becomes apparent. Finally, I will consider several critical reactions which could
target the argument in its reconstructed form and try to claim that a critical evaluation of
Wittgenstein’s argument is nowhere near an end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rezumat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Textul urm\u0103tor reprezint\u0103 o analiz\u0103 critic\u0103 a paragrafului 6.41 din Tractatus
Logico-Philosophicus. A\u0219a cum l-am \u00een\u021beles, textul con\u021bine un argument, central pentru
\u00eentreaga lucrare 2 , menit s\u0103 sus\u021bin\u0103 concluzia din 6.421: \u201eEste clar c\u0103 etica nu poate s\u0103 fie
exprimat\u0103\u201d 3 . \u00cen cele ce urmeaz\u0103 \u00eemi propun s\u0103 fac urm\u0103toarele lucruri. \u00cen primul r\u00e2nd,
voi vorbi despre contextul paragrafului respectiv. Voi \u00eencerca, apoi, s\u0103 reconstruiesc
argumentul din 6.41 \u00een a\u0219a fel \u00eenc\u00e2t structura logic\u0103 a acestuia s\u0103 devin\u0103 vizibil\u0103. \u00cen fine,
voi lua \u00een considerare c\u00e2teva reac\u021bii critice posibile la adresa argumentului reconstruit,
\u00eencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 sus\u021bin c\u0103 evaluarea critic\u0103 a acestuia e departe de a se fi \u00eencheiat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n