{"id":397,"date":"2024-03-16T11:31:38","date_gmt":"2024-03-16T11:31:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/?p=397"},"modified":"2024-03-16T11:31:38","modified_gmt":"2024-03-16T11:31:38","slug":"mircea-flonta-o-a-doua-critica-a-ratiunii-teoretice-conceptul-cunoasterii-intractatus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/mircea-flonta-o-a-doua-critica-a-ratiunii-teoretice-conceptul-cunoasterii-intractatus\/","title":{"rendered":"MIRCEA FLONTA, O a doua critic\u0103 a ra\u021biunii teoretice? Conceptul cunoa\u0219terii \u00eenTractatus"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Abstract. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Is there a relationship between the goals pursued and presented in the Critique<br>of Pure Reason and in Tractatus logico-philosophicus? This text argues that such a relationship<br>will be ascertained if we will compare Kant\u2019s answer to the question \u201cHow are synthetic a<br>priori judgments possible?\u201d with the Tractarian answer to the question \u201cHow are propositions<br>of natural science possible?\u201d. Based on this comparison, the Tractatus may be deemed to<br>be a \u201cnew critique of theoretical reason\u201d. As in the case of the critique of theoretical<br>reason undertaken by Kant, the object of Tractarian investigation is constituted by<br>ascertaining internal requirements for possessing knowledge of the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br><strong>Rezumat. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Exist\u0103 o rela\u021bie \u00eentre obiective urm\u0103rite \u015fi rezultate prezentate \u00een Critica ra\u0163iunii pure \u015fi \u00een Tractatus logico-philosophicus? Se sus\u021bine \u015fi se argumenteaz\u0103 c\u0103 o asemenea<br>rela\u021bie va putea fi stabilit\u0103 dac\u0103 vom compara r\u0103spunsul lui Kant la \u00eentrebarea \u201cCum<br>sunt posibile judec\u0103\u021bi sintetice a priorice?\u201d \u015fi cu r\u0103spunsul dat \u00een Tractatus la \u00eentrebarea<br>\u201cCum sunt posibile propozi\u021bii ale \u015ftiin\u021bei naturii?\u201d. Pe temeiul acestei compara\u021bii,<br>Tractatus-ul poate fi caracterizat drept \u201co nou\u0103 critic\u0103 a ra\u021biunii teoretice\u201d. Ca \u015fi \u00een cazul<br>criticii ra\u021biunii teoretice \u00eentreprinse de Kant, obiectul cercet\u0103rii \u00een Tractatus \u00eel constituie<br>determinarea cerin\u0163elor interne ale cunoa\u015fterii lumii.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/RJAP-XIV-nr.-1-pe-2020-Mircea-Flonta.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of RJAP-XIV-nr.-1-pe-2020-Mircea-Flonta.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-d0d94a55-a877-467e-8598-9583b6c2e4e2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/RJAP-XIV-nr.-1-pe-2020-Mircea-Flonta.pdf\">RJAP-XIV-nr.-1-pe-2020-Mircea-Flonta<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/RJAP-XIV-nr.-1-pe-2020-Mircea-Flonta.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-d0d94a55-a877-467e-8598-9583b6c2e4e2\">Download<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract. Is there a relationship between the goals pursued and presented in the Critiqueof Pure Reason and in Tractatus logico-philosophicus? This text argues that such a relationshipwill be ascertained if we will compare Kant\u2019s answer to the question \u201cHow are synthetic apriori judgments possible?\u201d with the Tractarian answer to the question \u201cHow are propositionsof natural&hellip; <\/p>\n<p><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/mircea-flonta-o-a-doua-critica-a-ratiunii-teoretice-conceptul-cunoasterii-intractatus\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[139],"tags":[182,181,180],"class_list":["post-397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mircea-flonta","tag-propozitii-ale-stiintei-naturii","tag-propozitii-sintetice-a-posteriori","tag-propozitii-sintetice-a-posteriori-propozitii-ale-stiintei-naturii-cerinte-interne-versus-cerinte-externe-ale-cunoasterii-lumii","xfolkentry","clearfix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=397"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":399,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397\/revisions\/399"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}