{"id":180,"date":"2018-09-09T17:09:55","date_gmt":"2018-09-09T17:09:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/?page_id=180"},"modified":"2025-06-11T17:12:02","modified_gmt":"2025-06-11T15:12:02","slug":"issue-2-2014-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/issue-2-2014-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2014, Vol VIII, no. 2 (July-Dec 2014)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Research articles<\/strong><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/ostension-and-demonstrative-reference-by-gheorghe-stefanov\/\">OSTENSION AND DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE <\/a>by Gheorghe \u0218tefanov<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/the-scope-of-the-truthmaker-requirement-by-adam-lovett\/\">THE SCOPE OF THE TRUTHMAKER REQUIREMENT <\/a>by Adam Lovett<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/the-problem-of-truth-in-the-classical-analysis-of-knowledge-by-filip-v-rossi\/\">THE PROBLEM OF TRUTH IN THE CLASSICAL ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE<\/a> by Filip V. Rossi<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/reanalyzing-chisholm-paradox-structural-insights-by-bianca-savu\/\">REANALYZING CHISHOLM PARADOX. STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS<\/a> by Bianca Savu<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reviews<\/strong><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/carnaps-ideal-of-explication-and-naturalism-edited-by-pierre-wagner-review-by-constantin-brincus\/\">Carnap\u2019s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism, edited by Pierre Wagner<\/a> (Review by Constantin Br\u00eencu\u0219)<\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/cop.-70x100-RRFA-VIII-nr.2-2014.pdf\" class=\"pdfemb-viewer\" style=\"\" data-width=\"max\" data-height=\"max\" data-toolbar=\"bottom\" data-toolbar-fixed=\"off\">cop. 70x100 - RRFA, VIII, nr.2-2014<\/a>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Research articlesOSTENSION AND DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE by Gheorghe \u0218tefanovTHE SCOPE OF THE TRUTHMAKER REQUIREMENT by Adam LovettTHE PROBLEM OF TRUTH IN THE CLASSICAL ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE by Filip V. RossiREANALYZING CHISHOLM PARADOX. STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS by Bianca Savu ReviewsCarnap\u2019s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism, edited by Pierre Wagner (Review by Constantin Br\u00eencu\u0219)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-180","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","xfolkentry","clearfix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/180\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":829,"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/180\/revisions\/829"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.srfa.ro\/rrfa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}