REFERENCES

J.R.B. Arenhart, O. Bueno, “Structural Realism and the Nature

of Structure”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, (2015)

5 (1): 111-139.

A. Baker, “The Indispensability Argument and Multiple

Foundations for Mathematics”, Philosophical Quarterly, (2003)

53: 49-67.

M. Balaguer, Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics, New

York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

S. Bangu, The Applicability Of Mathematics In Science: Indispensability

And Ontology, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

C. Bărboianu, The Structural Alternatives and Metatheoretical Aspects

of the Solutioning of the Problem of Applicability of Mathematics

in Sciences, doctoral thesis, University of Bucharest – Department

of Philosophy, 2017.

N. Bourbaki, “The Architecture of Mathematics”, The American

Mathematical Monthly, (1950) 57(4): 221-232.

O. Bueno, M. Colyvan, “An Inferential Conception of the Application

of Mathematics”, Noûs, (2011) 45(2): 345-374.

O. Bueno, S. French & J. Ladyman, “On Representing the Relationship

between the Mathematical and the Empirical”, Philosophy of

Science, (2002) 69: 497–518.

N. da Costa & S. French, Science and Partial Truth, New York: Oxford

University Press, 2003.

L. Corry, “Nicolas Bourbaki and the Concept of Mathematical

Structure”, Synthese, (1992) 92(3): 315-348.

M. Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press, 1991.

S. French, The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation,

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

S. French & J. Ladyman, “A Semantic Perspective on Idealization

in Quantum Mechanics” in Idealization in Contemporary Physics,

N. Shanks (Ed.), Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998: 51-73.

C.G. Hempel, “Geometry and Empirical Science”, The American

Mathematical Monthly, (1945) 52(1): 7-17.

J. Ladyman, “On the Identity and Diversity of Objects in a

Structure” in Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume,

Vol. 81, No. 1. Oxford: The Oxford University Press, 2007.

M. Leng, “What’s Wrong with Indispensability? (Or the Case for

Recreational Mathematics)”, Synthese, (2002) 131: 395-417.

D. Lomas, “What perception is doing, and what it is not doing, in

mathematical reasoning”, The British Journal for the Philosophy

of Science, (2002) 53(2): 205-223.

A.G. Mujumdar, T. Singh, “Cognitive science and the connection

between physics and mathematics” in Trick or Truth?

(pp. 201-217). Springer International Publishing.

J. Piaget, Le Structuralisme, Paris: Presses Universitaire de

France, 1968.

C. Pincock, “A New Perspective on the Problem of Applying

Mathematics”, Philosophia Mathematica, (2004) 12(2): 135-161.

M.D. Resnik, Mathematics as a Science of Patterns, Oxford: Clarendon

Press, 1997.

S. Shapiro, “Mathematics and Reality”, Philosophy of Science, 1983,

Vol. 50: 523-548.

M. Steiner, The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem,

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

B. Teissier, “Protomathematics, perception and the meaning of

mathematical objects” in Images and Reasoning, P. Grialou, G.

Longo and M. Okada (Eds.), Tokyo: Keio University, 2005.

E.P. Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in

the Natural Sciences”, Communications on Pure and Applied

Mathematics, (1960) 13(1): 1-14.

F. Ye, “The Applicability of Mathematics as a Scientific and a

Logical Problem”, Philosophia Mathematica, (2010) 18(2): 144-165.